Dear Irrational (is it rational to visit mother?)
Adaptation to new new circumstances? — happiness
An interesting story about research on well-being and our understanding of it was published today in the NYT. The issue is whether people get used to new life circumstances and, as a consequence, their long-term happiness (well-being) is not affected. Basically, a large body of research on well-being suggests that people in general become used to new circumstances to an extent that is beyond their, and others’, initial estimates (Diener and Diener 1996; Diener and Suh 1997; Gilbert et al. 1998; Kahneman 1999; Schkade and Kahneman 1998). For example, it has even been suggested that people who sustain a substantial injury are not much worse off than people who have not (Brickman, Coates, and Janoff-Bulman 1978). The story in the NYT describes some new research that questions these findings.
Here are some personal reflections on this topic:
(more…)
April 15th — Cheating and taxes
Tax Season is here and cheating is in the air. We are all trying to find receipts, and figure out what we can reasonably claim as deductions. Did we end up talking about work last summer when we invited our co-workers for a BBQ?
Let me tell you about an experiment we did at MIT on cheating with some unsuspecting students. (more…)
Clinton, Obama, and the decoy effect!
Dear Irrational (daughter out of the house)
Dear Irrational –
Our daughter graduated from college last winter and decided to move back home until she found a job. She is bright and full of potential. However, she is having trouble deciding on what kind of career she should pursue. Her problem is not that nothing interests her, it’s that she is interested in too many things and is having trouble deciding which path she should choose.
While my husband and I love her and are happy that we are able to support her, we are becoming frustrated with her indecisiveness. She has gone on several job interviews but is reluctant to accept any offers for fear that she’ll make the wrong decision.
What advice can you give us that might help her make a decision?
Thank you,
J. H, California
(more…)
Speculations on Bear Stearns
Can it be that cheating and taking too much risk are related?
We learned that people cheat more when the object of cheating is even one step removed from money. Could it be that when financial tools are more complex it encourages people to take too much risk? It is hard to tell, but I suspect this might be the case.
Dear irrational!
Tim Harford has a very nice column called “Dear Economist” in which he responds to questions people email him about economics and daily life (and he writes very clever and interesting answers).
Recently, I started getting lots of email from people with personal questions about kids, illness, jobs and romance — and I would like to propose that if anyone wants their questions about irrationality answered in a public forum (anonymously of course), send them to me (using the link on the right bar), and once a week I will pick a question and do my best to reflect on it on this blog.
Irrationally yours
Dan
Do we know enough to give stimulus packages?
The US government is clearly under some pressure to take action in an attempt to stabilize the economy, and as a consequence, recently announced a $150 billion (more or less) stimulus packages that is supposed to rejuvenate the economy and stabilize the market (H.R. 5140 — the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008).
Will the current plan achieve the government’s goals? (more…)
Discussions of Predictably Irrational
The reactions I get directly from people and indirectly from bloggers to Predictably Irrational are really wonderful, and I am delighted that the book is creating so much interest and discussion. Of course some people have different points of disagreements and other points of view, but this is part of the learning process (and thanks to the discussions and feedback, I am learning a lot). The range of interest in Predictably Irrational is particularly exciting for me. For example this weekend Predictably Irrational was one of the New York Times Sunday Review of Books Editors’ Choice AND it was selected for a discussion in the Sunday service of the Greater Nashville Unitarian Universalist Congregation. What more can I ask for?
Irrationally yours,
Dan
Greenspan as a behavioral economist
Zubin Jelveh just posted a very interesting blog post relating to Alan Greenspan’s recent piece in the Financial Times.Zubin ends the post by saying:”Just last month, Steve Levitt and John List of the University of Chicago wrote that as neat as the findings of behavioral economics have been over the past two-and-a-half decades, their practical usefulness has remained marginal:
Perhaps the greatest challenge facing behavioral economics is demonstrating its applicability in the real world. In nearly every instance, the strongest empirical evidence in favor of behavioral anomalies emerges from the lab. Yet, there are many reasons to suspect that these laboratory findings might fail to generalize to real markets.
I’d like to add the financial collapse of 2007-08 as Exhibit A.” I am not sure if this is Exhibit A (I think we had a few before), but I do think that it deserves some serious attention and some serious consideration of how to prevent this from happening again. Irrationally yours, Dan