Ask Ariely: On Lyrics, Joint Accounts, and Dialing Mom
Here’s my Q&A column from the WSJ this week — and if you have any questions for me, just email them to AskAriely@wsj.com.
______________________________________________________
Dear Dan,
The Korean music video “Gangnam Style” by the pop singer PSY has now been viewed on YouTube over a half billion times. Why do you think this video has become so popular? Most viewers don’t understand what PSY is singing about in Korean, yet they seem to love the video anyway.
I wonder if this is partially because the words are in a foreign language that they don’t have a clue about. It’s the same in my country, Kazakhstan. Although Kazakhstanis usually do not get the content of what they are listening to, they love American pop music and (these days) Korean pop. The closest parallel I can think of is when a woman wearing a miniskirt generates more curiosity than a woman who’s fully undressed.
Recently, PSY announced that his next debut will be in English. Would this be a mistake?
-Nurdaulet
A few years ago, Mike Norton, Jeana Frost and I looked at the question of ambiguity and found exactly the mechanism you’re suggesting—that knowing less can lead to higher liking. Focusing on online dating, we found that when people read online profiles of potential partners that were more ambiguous and imprecise, they liked the profiles more. That’s because when we face new information we try to resolve ambiguity, but rather than do it accurately, we let our minds fill in the gaps in an overly optimistic way. Sadly, we eventually meet the person behind the dating profile, and then our expectations get crushed (which, by the way, happens a bit more to women).
I just tried to understand the PSY phenomenon for myself (in an admittedly unscientific way) by watching 10 YouTube clips of popular songs (in English) without paying much attention to the words. Then I read each lyric carefully, twice. What I found is that the quality of the lyrics was surprisingly low, and this cut down on my appreciation of the videos, which I’d initially enjoyed.
What this suggests is that it might be good for the musicians to get people not to pay attention to the lyrics—maybe by creating very hectic music videos or by singing in a different language, or both. So if I were PSY, I’d switch to a language that almost no one understands—maybe Yiddish.
______________________________________________________
Dear Dan,
I recently got married, and my wife and I have been debating the topic of bank accounts. She’d like to combine them, because she wants to know how much is coming in and going out. I think separate accounts would be simpler for taxes, personal spending and budgeting. What’s your take?
-Jonathan
The fact that you’re wondering whether to follow your preferences or your wife’s tells me that you are either a slow learner or very recently married (sorry, my Jewish heritage would not let me pass up that opportunity). But to the point: I think you should have a joint account.
First, there’s no question that in reality your accounts are joint in the sense that anything one of you does has an effect on your mutual financial future. For example, if one of you starts buying expensive cars from your individual account, there’s going to be less money for both of you to spend later on vacations, medical bills and so on.
More important, by getting married you have created a social contract of the form: “I will take care of you, and you will take care of me.” Adding a layer of financial negotiations to this intricate relationship can easily backfire. Think about what would happen if there was “my money” and “your money”? Would you start splitting the bill in restaurants? What if one of you has an extra glass of wine? And what if your wife ran out of “her money”? Would you tell her that if she does the dishes and takes the garbage out for a week, you would give her some of “your money”?
The problem is that once money becomes intertwined with deep relationships, they can start looking a bit more like prostitution than like love, romance and long-term caring. Separate bank accounts do have some advantages, but having them could put unnecessary stress on your relationship—and your relationship is much more important than managing your money efficiently.
______________________________________________________
Dear Dan,
My son travels a lot and as a consequence we don’t talk much. Can you suggest a way that I can talk to him more frequently?
-Yoram
I suspect that your son has a busy life and that his lack of calling does not reflect his love or caring for you. This said, maybe you can pick a regular day and time to talk, and this will make your conversations more likely. And I promise to call you and mom the moment I get back from South America.
Love, Dan
See the original article in the Wall Street Journal here.

The Honest Truth About Dishonesty: How We Lie to Everyone - Especially Ourselves

Dan, I have to disagree with picking a regular time to talk.
Doing so, you risk turning a social, semi-spontaneous (i.e. whenever we like, or whenever we can) interaction to a pre-planned, transactional, routine interaction. I’m afraid this might also be irreversible in the sense that if all of a sudden they started calling at certain times, then there would be no calls at other times and the social bond would weaken.
To exaggerate this example, think of a couple, where one of the partners is travelling often and the other partner wishes to have intimacy more often. Can you imagine setting times for intimacy working?
My family is fairly busy – we don’t spend all that much time in our house. My parents are similarly busy, and live on the other side of the planet. If we didn’t arrange times to talk, we would never talk – the chance that a time when one of us had half an hour to sit down, pick up the phone and call would overlap with a time when the other was awake and at home is close to zero.
I have to agree with Sam that a regular time is best. For one, that way it’s somewhat expected, so you can arrange things around it even when busy. Also, you can plan ahead if you know it’s not going to work that day. In my opinion it’s easier to miss the scheduled call on Sunday & get over it than go a week being constantly they didn’t call any night that week.
AK, to your point – my husband does travel frequently, If we don’t plan a bit in advance, the time when he’s home can easily stretch from “too tired from traveling” to “too busy preparing for upcoming trip” without us realizing it and taking advantage of our time together. Planning, at least for us, does help!
Bravo Dan! Wonderful thoughts on the first two!
There may be problems about the regular call time though. It could create a new situation where if a call is late, the other party really worries about something gone wrong. As long as the regular call is not an absolute set time, but is fuzzy like “Sunday evening” then it probably will work.
Anyway, I personally agree with your assessment about lyrics strongly. The quality of most song lyrics is terrible. Much better if they aren’t understood. There are some artists who actually sing in made-up gibberish that is reminiscent of language. Anyway, Professor Ian Cross from Cambridge has an idea about this called “floating intentionality.” Essentially, we can all enjoy a song together because the meaning isn’t clear. We can impose our own interpretation on it while still believing that everyone else is experiencing it the same way. Music can then bring us together because we create an illusion of agreement and solidarity that would fall apart if we started focusing on specific words and get into arguments when we don’t agree about the message.
Your point about not knowing about someone makes them desirable explains a lot about how politics works, especially the recent US presidential election, except people are stuck with thier choice for years
The real question is how to change the political system so vagueness isn’t rewarded.
“The fact that you’re wondering whether to follow your preferences or your wife’s tells me that you are either a slow learner or very recently married”
I LAUGHED a lot.
Thanks Dan!
NPR just had a story about Italian singer Adriano Celentano who created a song 40 years ago using English language sounds, but actually no English words…so it sounds like English, but means nothing. He re-released the song again now and it is a major hit all over Europe. As a kid growing in Croatia I loved to hear English speaking bands even I could not understand what they were saying (singing). Now, that I can, just like you Dan, many of those hits actually lost a value w me due to crappy words. Funny!
I have four busy kids so the only way we can keep up is to supplement calls and visits with email. We can do it anytime. Plus we can talk face to face over the internet now
Last Friday our son (11) introduced us to the PSY video on YouTube. On Saturday I bought the song. I like that kind of music (rhythm, beat) when running. I guess our son likes it because “Gangnam style” (the words) are quite catchy. the other part he understands is “sexy lady”. He always smiles when he sings them…
I also think that in Europe, where we live, people are more used to songs in different languages and not understanding anything. I believe the USA or Latin America are a bit of an island in that sense. I guess Asia is similar to Europe: there are not that many (good) artists in one country to satisfy different needs so people make a trade-off, understanding vs. what they like (bpm, etc.).
BTW, I got songs in 8 different languages in my running playlist and I only use 3 myself.
I usually listen (actively) to the lyrics and I also searched YouTupe for an English version of the PSY video.
Take care,
:O)Bernhard
Dan what about the famous ‘three pot’ system for money – mine, yours and ours? With each partner paying into ‘ours’ in a way pro-rated to reflect income? I know all too well about the manipulations that can come when a couple has a ‘joint’ account only. The psychological cost of not having one’s own financial freedoms and responsibilities can be very damaging – beware.
But you don’t have your own freedom and responsibility – that’s the point. If one spouse runs up big debts, the pair of you are on the hook for the consequences. How would it work otherwise – the indebted spouse eating Ramen every night whilst the other one grilled a single steak?
If you mean “is it healthy to have a pot of spending money that you and you alone control, so you can buy some expensive frippery without feeling guilty, or having your spending analyzed by a controlling spouse then sure – it’s a good thing to budget some amount for personal spending and not have the other spouse second-guess you. I wouldn’t set it up the way you suggest, though – I would explicitly pay all family income into “our” pot, then allocate an equal amount of spending money to each spouse. Your model breaks completely if one spouse stops working in order to raise children.
Whether you require explicitly separate pots, or just have an understanding of what “frivolous” spending is permissible will depend on your personalities.
I like that idea of allowing spending money. It’s much like how my family is set up, although currently it’s not a set amount. That way I don’t have to use cash to buy gifts or indulgences
I believe PSY’s videos have been successful because of the catchy music, choreography of the video and coming across as a group effort (projected as something that is already popular). Would the song had been popular if it was released only in the audio format without a video? The answer to this would be interesting and my speculation is that it would vary if one is more visually inspired or prefers the auditory mode.
AReoMoUoGFEdYiRtti 4580
“For example, if one of you starts buying expensive cars from your individual account, there’s going to be less money for both of you to spend later on vacations, medical bills and so on.”
That is just as true for a joint account. So the point you were implying is not valid.
Moreso, if one of the couple that is married decides to leave and raid the joint bank account they can do so. Which they cannot with separate accounts.
As such I disagree with your advice. My parents have been happily married (only ever arguing over my mothers (now ceased) smoking habit) for 50 years. They had separate accounts. They defined the roles each was responsible for. My father had to pay the mortgage and various bills. My mother had to pay the rest. Simple. And no risk if one decided to split.
My parents never quibble over paying for meals or drink etc as you describe in your example. Crikey if you did that when you were dating would you marry him/her? Of course not.
It’s a sample size of one. So not significant. I happen to think they got it right.
Reading your book Predicably Irrational. Great stuff.
Hey there! I’m at work surfing around your blog from my new iphone! Just wanted to say I love reading through your blog and look forward to all your posts! Carry on the great work!|
Hey! I know this is kinda off topic however , I’d figured I’d ask. Would you be interested in exchanging links or maybe guest writing a blog article or vice-versa? My website goes over a lot of the same subjects as yours and I think we could greatly benefit from each other. If you happen to be interested feel free to shoot me an e-mail. I look forward to hearing from you! Excellent blog by the way!|
Nice post. I learn something new and challenging on websites I stumbleupon on a daily basis. It’s always interesting to read through articles from other authors and practice a little something from other sites. |
Many thanks for writing this awesome put up..Liked your articles. Please do hold writin