Swiss Army People
Plato once said that people are like dirt. They can nourish you or stunt your growth. This seems sage and reasonable, but I think people are more like Swiss Army knives (To be fair, Plato did not have the benefit of knowing of such a tool, so I don’t think I’m detracting from his comparison in the least). Swiss Army knives, as we all know, are incredibly versatile, and have a tool for almost any situation. Need to open a package—it’s got a knife! Sharing beers with friends on the beach—it’s got an opener! Have something in your teeth—there’s a toothpick for that! Need to do a little electrical work—it’s a got a tool that can strip wires! The downside is that Swiss Army knives are not particularly good for any specific purpose because any really intricate task is going to require much more specific tools.
People are a lot like Swiss Army knives from this perspective, and I am saying this with tremendous appreciation. A lot of the research in behavioral economists criticizes people for various ineptitudes: why we don’t save money, why we don’t exercise, why we text and drive. And it’s true, there’s a lot to criticize and a lot that goes wrong in our decision-making processes, but when you consider just how versatile we are, it’s very impressive. Essentially, we do a lot of things sort of OK. We can reason moderately well about money, we’re often pretty good with various relationships, we’re fairly moral, and most of the time we don’t kill ourselves or others. Not bad if you think about it this way!
Now, some people are more like the specialty tools, like post hole diggers, or lemon zesters, or cigar cutters; in these cases these individuals are truly excellent in certain domains. But often these people aren’t the best at navigating the world in a pragmatic fashion. There are often savants, like Kim Peek (the person that Rain Man is based on), who certainly can’t handle the day-to-day on their own, but have extraordinary abilities in other spheres. And plenty of geniuses have similar problems; take Bobby Fischer’s statelessness and detentions, or van Gogh’s famously self-detrimental tendencies and ultimate suicide. If everyone were like these folks, our species would surely be in peril. If people were all specialized, and could only think numerically, or long-term, or probabilistically, what would life be like? Neither rich nor long.
Of course these people provide inspiration and spur progress, and we admire and celebrate many of them (who don’t put their genius to antisocial use), but we should be grateful that most of us are more like Swiss Army knives.

The Honest Truth About Dishonesty: How We Lie to Everyone - Especially Ourselves

Interesting and inspiring. I like the fact that it celebrates “average” – which is a much needed perspective the current times where many seem to believe problems are going to be solved by extraordinary and “irreplaceable” people.
How about trying to be a Swiss Army knife with one good tool in addition to many average ones?
For example, a computer programmer who is brilliant in his field, yet has a normal family life, doesn’t take any drugs, and text&drives but never drives off a cliff intentionally.
Shouldn’t that be our goal?
I would say to “avimeir” that you can’t have it both ways. For someone to excel beyond being merely “brilliant in his field” (in other words, to be the best in the world), then something has to give — family life, leisure activities, etc. Ask any Olympic gold medalist, and I suspect he or she would agree with me.
Hear! hear!
I have recently contemplated the miracle that is our organized society – how stable it is in light of all our failings. I’m amazed that roads stay fixed, people keep obeying basic norms and laws… it all just keeps on ticking.
Knowing what I know of autistic children and adults, I also think that your reference to such cases as a specialization is spot on – as well as their needs for guidance in what for others are simple, ordinary tasks and approaches to living.
Thanks for sharing an upper for the day, Dan.
“A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.”
― Robert A. Heinlein
Interesting perspective. However, you may want to check on the possibility Van Gohn was murdered instead of committing suicide.
See: Steven Naifeh and Gregory White Smith “Van Gogh: The Life”,
There is one thing Swiss Army Knives are perfect for: gifts.
Original observation,thanks confirming the necessity of our Trust survival genes existence (evolutionary priviledge, natural harmony tendency).
All comments have something in common,they are versatile and useful (like SAN or an individual in the society)!
I’m really interesting in your book.May I ask a question?If all the people knew the behavioral economics thorough,what the world would be?Would it be unpredictable?
I recently heard a discouraging-yet-encouraging remark that come the apocalypse, or whatever happens when climate, population, food, water, war and other such issues overwhelm us, it is unlikely that the human race will be wiped out. Maybe we’ll regress a few thousand years and start again, but we’re just too adaptable to go the way of the dinosaurs.
Swiss army knife?
Nah…
Maybe a spork, at best.
Having been married to a man with Aspergers, and knowing many Quants spend their days dreaming up schemes to make money for wall street no matter who might suffer the consequences, I would rather be a muli purpose army knife than a self serving, focused “tool.”
Why does reading this make me feel really competent and happy? I don’t know, but it does.
I must admit, I belong in the Swiss Army Knife category yet I have no problem with that and is actually quite proud.
I disagree. I have noticed a tendency for those who are excellent at one thing to be also good at other things, and for people who are truly terrible at something to be less than average on many. I think that there is some drive to achieve as well as innate and acquired skills involved. Take a group of science professors and you will find among them a surprising number of artists, musicians, dancers, writers, and people who are handy with home repairs, cooking, and an assortment of other skills. The reverse seems to hold true as well. The student who struggles in math who does foolish thing in their relationships, can’t write well, etc. It is not universally true, of course! But I more often see talent upon talent and failure upon failure.
The bottom line is that indeed, there are people that are excellent in a lot of areas, and people that suck at virtually everything. But not a lot in neither of both groups. For most of us, we are pretty average in a lot of things. It’s just a statistical phenomenon, and these phenomena are based on the facts of Nature. And that if we weren’t, we probably wouldn’t have come that far as a species.
I for one am dedicating my future research based on that point of view. Instead of focusing on what most of us can’t do, emphasizing what we actually can is far more meaningful!
Nice piece
This may be nice platform for social experiment. Do ‘swiss-army-people need to know boundaries or set boundaries ? When will they feel good about it ? Will they compete or just sit aside.
What if boundaries, as point of anchoring are changed within experiment ? For example if someone within a group figure out that he is the very best in the world in whatever (running 100m or eating sandwiches) , how that changes perception within a group ? Will other follow (try to compete) or just accept that achievement is out of reach ? Does it have consumer behavior side effects ?
Buying lottery ticket is (or it’s not) a need to compete with same chances (once you’re not specialized in anything) ? What is percentage of lottery players in general population, and what in top 100 of any sport ? Will ‘swiss-army-people’ compete if there is a fair change to win or will they accept run on 100m with Bolt ?
Great stuff! Interesting and informative read, Thanks for making it.
Perfect !
I want to to thank you for this good read!! I certainly enjoyed every little bit of it. I’ve got you saved as a favorite to look at new stuff you post…|
Thanks for writing this super article..Beloved your posts. Be sure to do preserve writin